art: Karolina Matyjaszkowicz
Presentations
When the written report brings in something substantially and significantly beyond what I learned about your project from your presentation, I alter the component grades for M (methods) and / or T (content). Usually, I evaluate the report separately and calculate the average (the average points for the presentation plus the report - divided into two)
80-100: excellent (5); where 90 and more is outstanding work (5+)
76-79: very good (4+)
66-75: good (4)
61-65: adequate (3+)
51-60: fair (3)
Categories:
Method (M); Contents (T); Form (F)
Reviews 2023
05/06
(1) The Process of Becoming
M: 80
T: 88
F: 90
Strengths: Explanation of theme and background; beautiful video; very good metaphor (network of stories); the issue of intentionality and non-intentionality framed in pertinent way; context; role of values; relationships; role of animals; role of consciousness well framed; examples well chosen and well embedded in argumentation; link to theory; interesting ideas; problematization; some discussion after presentation; strong implications for further research
Weaknesses: link to organizing and organizations could be made stronger and more explicit; questions to complex for discussion in class
Metadata: OK
In all: 83; 5, very good
(2) The Female Gaze
M: 80
T: 90
F: 90
Strengths: attempt at deep problematization; multi-level analysis of culture; good selection of examples; contextualization (cultures); linking of different kinds of material and argument; some response from class
Weaknesses: no explicit connection to organizing/ organizations; few links to experience
Metadata: OK
In all: 87; very good
(3) Eternal Child
M:
T:
F:
Strengths: Examples from different contexts; characters from popular culture; interpretations; different shades of the archetype (!); art - attempt at link
Weaknesses: no comments on the origins of the Disney characters; fragmentation (no links between characters and ideas); organizational context not interpreted; links superficial
Metadata:
In all:
12/06
(1)
M:
T:
F:
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
Metadata:
In all:
(2)
M:
T:
F:
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
Metadata:
In all: